Folks,
I’ve got some in information on the following links:
http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/02/apple-patent-attack-the-multi-touch-gesture-dictionary/
http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PG01&p=1&u=/netahtml/PTO/srchnum.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1="20070177803".PGNR.&OS=DN/20070177803&RS=DN/20070177803
http://www.wipo.int/pctdb/en/wo.jsp?WO=2008085784&IA=US2007089161&DISPLAY=DESC
http://www.macobserver.com/article/2008/07/03.9.shtml
Or just type “multitouch gesture dictionary “ on google.
After all if Apple or other company or an indivual person want to get a patent over a technology they or he developed is Ok. If we’re talking about sofwtare, hardware, an innovative algorithm...ok.
Imagine if someone get a patent over music chords. In that case he can claim for royalts every time someone want to write a song using that notation.
I beleive that this kind of of thing generates restriction over the freedom of the creative process and expression.
Imagine the case when you develop some new kind of algorithm that improves gesture reconigtion time in let’s say...100%.
You are free to request a patent for that mothod. It’s Ok.
But if someone else already get a patent over the gesture reconigtion it self, then you probably will have to pay royalties to use, sell or even develop software, using your own algorithm.
Again, that’s what I think about it. I’m not a patent expert and maybe I could be wrong in many points. Sorry for my mistakes.
I just think that people at the NIU Group should discuss this things, because they affect all of us.
[]’s
Gerson Tessler