1 of 2
1
MS LaserTouch. 
Posted: 07 July 2008 03:05 PM   [ Ignore ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  265
Joined  2007-09-22

The majority of you now know that thanks to AlexP’s work we can use lasers for blob tracking.
After TouchWall came into existance to the public , MS presented LaserTouch. -> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ne_QgTKjnMg
They are using a normal modified webcam over a tilted LCD panel and capture blobs formed from two lasers.
I think some of us should try it, just imagine what benefits this would give: ease of construction , portability prototyping.
A dispaly like this could be made with no modifications to the actual LCD or touchlib and asociated software.

You’d just place the camera , capture the background and off you go.

There are a few members on NUI who have bought lasers and line lenses. Alex , Fairlane , Justin.

So please , if one of you could test this baby out make a few videos , show how it performs , I think it could really help our community and jumpstart the building of more multitouch related technologies.

You can find a few more videos that give alot of details on the system here http://tshwi.blogspot.com/2008/05/more-of-microsofts-andy-wilson-video-of.html

Profile
 
 
Posted: 07 July 2008 05:18 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]
New Member
Avatar
Rank
Total Posts:  54
Joined  2008-05-20

What really impress me is how easy the camera could see the laser reflections at fingers. Obviously, this method has some disadvantages… if you block the laser reflection to be see it by the camera, there wouldn’t be any detection and this should be very often, when you pass one hand over the other or in a lot of moments at a normal screen manipulation.

Cheers!

Profile
 
 
Posted: 07 July 2008 05:19 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  468
Joined  2008-01-04

Hey Vlado, I’ll give it a shot when I get some time, for sure!

 Signature 

ORION Multi-Touch Display (blog)
My YouTube

Profile
 
 
Posted: 07 July 2008 05:21 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 3 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  265
Joined  2007-09-22

Well the obvious screen blockage would be an issue , but I’ve been making some calculations and schematics the last few days , been also experimenting with my wiimote whiteboard.
I think that a dual camera based setup from two sides could make any hd-tv into a multitouch display with no shadowing or nothing.

And a decent c2d or c2q procesor should be enough for dual camera action.I’ll post my findings tomorrow.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 08 July 2008 09:32 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 4 ]
New Member
Avatar
Rank
Total Posts:  12
Joined  2008-07-04

Nice info Vlado, I’m gonna start hunting for a webcam and those 2 lasers have to try this. I actually have 2 dvd-rom units at home. Will they do?

Profile
 
 
Posted: 08 July 2008 12:23 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 5 ]
Administrator
Avatar
RankRank
Total Posts:  197
Joined  2008-05-08
Bila - 08 July 2008 09:32 AM

Nice info Vlado, I’m gonna start hunting for a webcam and those 2 lasers have to try this. I actually have 2 dvd-rom units at home. Will they do?

The laser diodes from dvd-rom might do. Make sure they are the same brand. What kind of IR filter are you using? You will need to know the laser light wavelength. Be careful since the laser diodes from cd/dvd-rom burners are way more powerful than 5-10mW.

~Alex

 Signature 

Computing is not about computers any more.  It is about living!

~ Send me a PM about high quality laser modules for LLP ~

Profile
 
 
Posted: 08 July 2008 12:30 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 6 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  265
Joined  2007-09-22

Cd-rom based lasers are about 3.1-5 mW , that should actualy be safer than what your are using alex rasberry.And why would he need to know the wavelenght?
All cd-rom lasers are in the IR spectrum , 740nm if I recall corectly.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 08 July 2008 02:13 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 7 ]
Administrator
Avatar
RankRank
Total Posts:  197
Joined  2008-05-08
Vlado - 08 July 2008 12:30 PM

Cd-rom based lasers are about 3.1-5 mW , that should actualy be safer than what your are using alex rasberry.And why would he need to know the wavelenght?
All cd-rom lasers are in the IR spectrum , 740nm if I recall corectly.

Hey Vlado,

I was referring to CD\DVD burners since I saw that more and more people are experimenting with these. Remember the faster the burn speed, the more powerful the laser diode is.
The reason why I asked about the laser wavelength is because of the IR bandpass filter. If you are just using a simple film negative this is not an issue.
I actually recently experimented with lasers that are in the ~780nm range. I had some pre-fabbed for me and besides the fact that they are much cheaper, I can tell you that camera is more sensitive in this range. You can also see that by looking at the ccd sensor sensitivity graph. As a result of this I’m getting even brighter blobs than before!!!

~Alex

 Signature 

Computing is not about computers any more.  It is about living!

~ Send me a PM about high quality laser modules for LLP ~

Profile
 
 
Posted: 08 July 2008 04:52 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 8 ]
New Member
Avatar
Rank
Total Posts:  54
Joined  2008-05-20
AlexP - 08 July 2008 02:13 PM

Vlado - 08 July 2008 12:30 PM
Cd-rom based lasers are about 3.1-5 mW , that should actualy be safer than what your are using alex rasberry.And why would he need to know the wavelenght?
All cd-rom lasers are in the IR spectrum , 740nm if I recall corectly.

Hey Vlado,

I was referring to CD\DVD burners since I saw that more and more people are experimenting with these. Remember the faster the burn speed, the more powerful the laser diode is.
The reason why I asked about the laser wavelength is because of the IR bandpass filter. If you are just using a simple film negative this is not an issue.
I actually recently experimented with lasers that are in the ~780nm range. I had some pre-fabbed for me and besides the fact that they are much cheaper, I can tell you that camera is more sensitive in this range. You can also see that by looking at the ccd sensor sensitivity graph. As a result of this I’m getting even brighter blobs than before!!!

~Alex

Alex, I’m about to buy a pair of IR laser modules and reading your post make me think that the best wavelenght we should try is 780nm, isn’t?

Do you think that’s the same range for most commercial cameras (webcams)?

Cheers!

Profile
 
 
Posted: 08 July 2008 05:20 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 9 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  265
Joined  2007-09-22

Probo , whatever wavelenght you buy , as long as it’s IR it’ll be fine , with the filter removed webcams are sensitive to every kind of infrared.
There’s a few people on this forums experimenting with 840nm lasers , and getting great results.

As long as your laser is IR and between 5-10 mW it should be fine.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 08 July 2008 05:55 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 10 ]
Administrator
Avatar
RankRank
Total Posts:  197
Joined  2008-05-08
Probo - 08 July 2008 04:52 PM

AlexP - 08 July 2008 02:13 PM
Vlado - 08 July 2008 12:30 PM
Cd-rom based lasers are about 3.1-5 mW , that should actualy be safer than what your are using alex rasberry.And why would he need to know the wavelenght?
All cd-rom lasers are in the IR spectrum , 740nm if I recall corectly.

Hey Vlado,

I was referring to CD\DVD burners since I saw that more and more people are experimenting with these. Remember the faster the burn speed, the more powerful the laser diode is.
The reason why I asked about the laser wavelength is because of the IR bandpass filter. If you are just using a simple film negative this is not an issue.
I actually recently experimented with lasers that are in the ~780nm range. I had some pre-fabbed for me and besides the fact that they are much cheaper, I can tell you that camera is more sensitive in this range. You can also see that by looking at the ccd sensor sensitivity graph. As a result of this I’m getting even brighter blobs than before!!!

~Alex

Alex, I’m about to buy a pair of IR laser modules and reading your post make me think that the best wavelenght we should try is 780nm, isn’t?

Do you think that’s the same range for most commercial cameras (webcams)?

Cheers!

Either 850nm or 780nm will work. If you are talking about the inexpensive camera it will probably work the same.
Now once you start moving towards the high capture frame rates with shutter times <10ms you’ll see that things like good ir bandpass filter, laser placement and wavelength will play very important role in the performance of your setup.

~Alex

 Signature 

Computing is not about computers any more.  It is about living!

~ Send me a PM about high quality laser modules for LLP ~

Profile
 
 
Posted: 09 July 2008 04:50 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 11 ]
New Member
Rank
Total Posts:  59
Joined  2008-05-28

Cool stuff!!!

I like the idea of using light/dark of a DI frame as a bumpmap to render a 3d environment…

Would this be usefull to combine it with LLP FTIR?

You could use a fast frame controlled camera to capture a bumpmap and a blob every other frame....

You might not need the LLP anymore, but somehow it feels like draging in the air doesnt feel as natural als touching something real.

I’ve ordered 2 lasers from Alex so when they come in I will start playing around.

 Signature 

Our setup: Our big ass table

Profile
 
 
Posted: 09 July 2008 05:23 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 12 ]
New Member
Avatar
Rank
Total Posts:  12
Joined  2008-07-04

thx alexP and Vlado will give it a shot ... will be back when i get my little gizmos smile

Profile
 
 
Posted: 09 July 2008 11:18 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 13 ]
New Member
Avatar
Rank
Total Posts:  54
Joined  2008-05-20
Vlado - 08 July 2008 05:20 PM

Probo , whatever wavelenght you buy , as long as it’s IR it’ll be fine , with the filter removed webcams are sensitive to every kind of infrared.
There’s a few people on this forums experimenting with 840nm lasers , and getting great results.

As long as your laser is IR and between 5-10 mW it should be fine.

AlexP - 08 July 2008 05:55 PM

Either 850nm or 780nm will work. If you are talking about the inexpensive camera it will probably work the same.
Now once you start moving towards the high capture frame rates with shutter times <10ms you'll see that things like good ir bandpass filter, laser placement and wavelength will play very important role in the performance of your setup.

~Alex

Thanks Vlado and AlexP!

That’s exactly what I need to hear. I will buy my modules at 808nm, so when I try to make it work whit cheap webcams or more sophisticated cameras, could be as close as I can to the best posible range.

Cheers!

Profile
 
 
Posted: 09 July 2008 11:52 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 14 ]
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  509
Joined  2008-02-22

I have 2 IR lasers at 850nm. I started some tests yesterday and my fire i web cam picks it up well.

 Signature 

http://www.justinriggio.com cool mad
http://www.niceminds.com My blog

Profile
 
 
Posted: 09 July 2008 12:53 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 15 ]
New Member
Avatar
Rank
Total Posts:  12
Joined  2008-07-04
justin - 09 July 2008 11:52 AM

I have 2 IR lasers at 850nm. I started some tests yesterday and my fire i web cam picks it up well.

show us ur setup *photos* and/or some recorded test smile ufff tease us tease us will u? smile congrats .thx .i hope it goes well

Profile
 
 
   
1 of 2
1